I wound up fairly high on the request list at the library and started reading Guy Gavriel Kay's latest book last night.
I've been 'following' GGK for a while, now, and I think I've read every novel he's written. I wait (not so patiently) for the next to be penned and published. I would even do a re-read of some of his books, in parts because I like the characters he crafts, and his observations on 'life' have only gotten better (IMO).
(Another author I will - eventually - re-read is Dorothy Dunnett, for much the same reasons.)
The first few pages of this book are a masterclass in setting a stage, and developing a character.
One of the things I enjoy about GGK's writing is that he includes points from the historical record. If you know the history that he is referring to, you know which real events have been rolled into his stories. And sometimes? I find out that something that I thought was fantastical, was real. (I follow another writer who has a similar approach and it's always a delight when the penny drops.)
So, picture a young man in the dark of night and some of his musings as he waits for...something.
"He was young, of course. He might grow into something different, someone different. You weren't the same through the whole of your life, were you? Not marked by one thing. If you lived long enough to change, of course."
That paragraph on page 2 snagged me, and now I'm curious. What happens to him? What kind of adventure is he to partake in? Above all, will he survive?
I know that there are likely AI 'written' (stolen) books that will be drawing upon GGK's writing because he *is* a best selling author. I will not be reading them.
I want actual human experiences, created by actual humans. I want stories that make me think. To include actual history (when appropriate) and lessons to learn from. I don't want LLM scrapings from actual writers.
But that's me. As I thought about this book, I thought about what I hope to accomplish by continuing to write about weaving, from my 50 years of experience (and if that sentence doesn't make me feel 'old' I guess nothing will?)
My approach to weaving has always been to try to discover the 'why' of the craft. Explore the characteristics of my materials, the physics involved, and try to work out the mechanics of the equipment. None of which I've been 'trained' in, but tried to learn. Because all of that was part of the question of 'why'.
It's the same with human beings. Why is this person acting like this, when it is so against their own best interests? At times I find out why and can be sympathetic to their situation. Other times I find out why and walk away. Muttering 'not my circus, not my monkeys'. Sometimes I have to accept that I do not have the skills or the patience to help them try to wend their way through their life.
And that's the thing with a book. If you find the characters are too nasty or too...whatever...you are not compelled to finish reading the book. You can put it down and walk away. But I do NOT call for it to be banned because *I* did not like it.
GGK's characters are not all 'good'. I know that every person has flaws as well as good points. And sometimes the best thing they can do is be a really horrible example. But they are fiction. I can take the lesson and walk away.
Will the rest of this book be as good (or better?) than his previous books? Based on the first few pages, I would say yes.